Masthead header

 

For this weeks photo tip, I’ll suggest one of my favorites:  shallow depth of field. 

Using a shallow depth of field or wide aperture can radically change the look and focus of an image.  It not only helps eliminate distracting or unnecessary elements to a composition, but it also creates a dreamy feel to your image. 

First, figure out what is the widest your aperture will go and then create a composition where you have several objects that receded into the distance.  I chose in my sample image above, a pair of dice on a book.  I placed the dice one behind the other on a slanted book so that it too recedes into the background.  With an aperture of 1.8 and the focus point set on the front cube or die, I was able to let the rest of the image go soft. 

Try experimenting with wide apertures and see the effects.  It’s great for still life as well as portraiture.  By allowing the background to disappear, you keep your focus on the subject.  Enjoy!

This week I invite you to do an exercise based on the previous posts on how exposure works.

The theory I’d invite you to test is that your camera will always try to expose for middle grey unless you tell it otherwise.  While these cameras are smart, they don’t always know what you are shooting.  Remember, they always assume that you take photos of “average” scenes and subjects meaning that they are supposed to contain equal amounts of dark and light elements.  But what if you are taking a picture of a person in front of a big white wall or suddenly someone in a dark suit decides to step into your group photo?  White walls and darks suits are going to throw your light meter reading in your camera off because it can’t tell that you really want it to meter only the people’s faces.  The only way to really make sure what’s most important to you in any given frame is exposed well, is to take back control of the aperture, shutter speed and ISO settings. 

For this exercise, I suggest you take 4 test exposures of an ordinary object, with some light and dark values, and place it in front of a white background and then a dark background.  Make sure there is a lot more background than subject.  Do not use flash, so you’ll need to choose an ISO based on how much available light you have, (the higher ISO number is for less available light and visa versa).  The goal will be to expose correctly for the subject. 

Take one picture of your subject with the white background to start with.  Try to use a camera mode where you can either adjust the shutter speed in Tv mode (while keeping the aperture constant) or adjust the exposure compensation dial (+/_) so that in effect you force the camera to overexpose, thus compensating for all the white in the background.  You might take several frames to get the exposure right so that your subject is correctly exposed.  (When looking in your view finder, you would see a needle that moves left and right of a center notch.  Move the dial or button, depending on your camera, to the right of the center notch a couple of notches or stops.  Take a picture and see if your subject looks correctly exposed.)  When you get the settings right for a well exposed subject, take a photo.   Then without changing anything but the background, using the same settings, take another photo with the black background.  Your subject should still look good and all that changed was the background.  However, you may have noticed that the needle on the exposure level would have swung over to the left of center. 

Then take one picture with each background, with the camera in any of the modes, (just make sure your flash is disabled.  Do not adjust the exposure, just let the camera choose the aperture, shutter speed and ISO.  Watch how it tries to expose your image for an average middle grey value even if your average value might be almost white or almost black. 

If this was a cooking show, this is where I’d pull the finished pies out of the oven.  Below I posted the results of the exercise for you so that you can compare mine with your own results.  (These images are straight out of the camera with no editing.)  For my subject I set up an apple still life outside on a sunny day in the shade, so I knew I had lots of constant light and could hand hold the camera using a low ISO.  I chose manual mode because I have the most control there.  I set the ISO to 100 and the aperture to f3.5, so that all I was changing was the shutter speed.  I found that to get the apple correctly exposed I needed a shutter speed of 1/640 of a second.    

1/640 at f3.5

1/640 at f3.5

 These next two frames show what the camera would have chosen in auto exposure mode.  

1/1600 at f3.5 Apple is Too Dark

1/320 at f3.5 Apple is Too Light

Hopefully, you can see by this exercise that you can get much more consistent results if you find the correct exposure for your subjects first and then, provided that the light remains constant, you can leave the camera in manual mode with the same settings and not worry about the light meter reading changing your settings all over the place from frame to frame.  Remember, the goal is to always expose for the subject, usually faces when photographing people, then let the other values fall where they will.   It will take some practice, but learning how to consistently expose correctly is critical before any creativity can really begin to take place in your photography.   Hope this was helpful.

How did we get to the sunny days of summer already and where did those cool, fresh days of spring go?   Missing those moody, stormy skies that brought out all those spring colors.  Even my local swamp looks fresh all dressed up in spring green.

 

  • Peter Knickerbocker - May 6, 2010 - 9:09 am

    Beautiful photographs! The Old Farmer’s Almanac predicted the harsh winter and the hot spring. They are calling for a cool summer!

  • Renata - May 6, 2010 - 3:53 pm

    Now that’s an interesting prediction, -cool summer eh? Well, we shall see! Perhaps we should make our beach plans for this month! And thanks 🙂

 

 

Drum Roll Please…..Jocelyn R.   Congratulations!!!

Jocelyn is the winner of my “Our Lady of Tenderness Icon Pendant”! 

Our Lady of Tenderness Pendant

The image of Our Lady of Tenderness, also known as the Virgin of Tenderness, receives its name from the way Mother and Child as warmly embraced cheek to cheek.  This style is traditionally ascribed to St Luke the Evangelist who is considered to be the first iconographer.  By the Virgin’s somber and meditative eyes, it is as though she already foresees her Son’s Passion and desired to provide Him with refuge as eagerly as he seeks to console her.  Her deep red veil also underscores the depth of her sorrow to come.  The star on her forehead is one of three stars (the others not visible here) and they represent Mary’s virginity before, during and after the birth of her Son.  Jesus reveals Himself to us by the scroll he holds in His hand, indicating that He is the Word of God made flesh for our salvation.

For a little extra surprise… I wanted to say a big thank you the one who was the very first to subscribe by email with her own 5×7 note card featuring the full image of Our Lady of Tenderness and explanation on the back.  And that person is Juila R.!  

Congratulations to both our winners!  Looking forward to when the next prizes will be announced.  This is so fun!

Happy Feast of St Joseph to all!   And many blessings in this beautiful month of Our Lady!

  • Zoe - May 3, 2010 - 11:59 am

    Congrats to Jocelyn!

 

I was born and raised on film.  Back in the day, when talking about ISO (or ASA as it was called) I would explain to you how black and white film had on one side little silver halide crystals (or “grains”) nestled in the emulsion just waiting to be exposed to light.  These grains would come in various sizes, the smaller the grain, the less sensitive to light, the slower the speed, the lower the ISO number like 100.  The larger the grain, the more sensitive to light, the faster the speed, the higher the ISO number like 800.  So you can easily imagine a high ISO speed film having these big sponge like grains (this is my imagination speaking) just waiting to absorb and hold on to lots of light.  Each grain when hit by the light would expand and grow.  When the film was developed, the chemicals would further help grow the grains that were exposed to light while washing away the grains that were unexposed.  What you had left was a “negative” image of your subject.  The highlights would look dark on your film and the shadows would look thin.  If you had lots of clear spots you knew you’d have lots of black in your print.

If you knew you would be shooting in a low lit situation, you would want to choose a high ISO or fast speed film because the higher the number the faster those big grains could absorb or grab whatever available light there was, particularly if you had to hand hold your camera and you didn’t want to hold your shutter open too long so as to avoid camera shake.

 {I will be getting to digital I promise.}

So my old photographer professor use to say, “Everything in photography is a trade off.”   Let’s look at the pros and cons of high and low speed film.  High speed film, while heroically able to find and capture lots of light with it’s big fat grains, those proud big fat grains would show up in your print as well.  Now that wasn’t altogether a bad thing especially in black and white photography where in certain situations the “grainy” look was sometimes a great effect, (not so much in color though).  But if you wanted to show the smoothness of a shiny porcelain vase, you would need to have selected a low speed film with very fine grains to have your output in print also have that smooth, detailed look and finish.  You just had to make sure you put that vase in lots of light or stick your camera on a tripod so you could hold your shutter open long enough to grab the light without shaking it.

Now I haven’t a clue as to what actually happens on the digital sensor (that replaced the film emulsion) and part of me still doesn’t what to know.  I just know it can’t be nearly a romantic as imagining molecules grow, but that’s the repressed chemist in me speaking.  (Yes, I’m even fascinated by watching mold grow, so don’t ask me why I haven’t thrown that bit of something or other out of my fridge yet,  it’s just too interesting.)   Anyway… I never really got how the new magic happens on the sensors in the digital camera these days.  Thankfully, for our purposes here, it’s not that essential.  What’s important is to know what ISO numbers mean and how it affects both the exposure and the quality of your images.    

The ISO numbers still range from about 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 and even 6400+ in some cameras.  The ISO still means sensitivity to light but how the sensor (vs. the film) records that light and on what surface, is what is different and important to consider.

The low ISO’s like 100 or 200 still will produce the smoothest finish or look in the print or on screen, but instead of “grain” being the artifact resulting from higher ISO’s, in digital cameras you get “noise.”  Noise shows up as little blotches or color speckles, most noticeable in areas where there should be smooth continuous tone.  See my graphic above at the top of this post.  On the left half of the image I added noise to the smooth continuous tone of grey you see on the right half.  Digital noise holds nothing of the appeal or charm of film grain, so the goal really is to avoid it from the start or reduce the noise later with various noise reduction software out there these days.  It is possible to add in the look of grain with software as well, but I just don’t think it’s the same quality as in film.

What kind of camera you use also affects the noise factor.  Different cameras have different size sensors built into them.  So even though a point and shoot, cropped sensor SLR or full frame SLR might all hold the same amount of megapixels, the smaller sensors will still produce more noise because each pixel needs to be smaller to be able to fit on the smaller sensor, so it can’t hold as much information as the pixels on the larger sensors can.  (In this case, larger individual pixel size holds more information and produces better picture quality unlike its ancestor, the film grain.)  The negative or con to larger pixels on larger sensors are far larger files, so the less images you can fit on a card.  Remember, there is always a trade off!  So when choosing a camera one thing you would need to consider is how big the files you want to work with are versus the noise you can live with, or commit to spending time reducing in post processing.

But lets return to exposure.  Have I lost anyone yet?  So the ISO number gives you the light sensitivity setting.  You want to consider your ISO when making choices about your Shutter Speed and Aperture.  You always want to work with the lowest ISO number possible to get you the cleanest and most detailed image.  So if you are in bright sun, you’ve got lots of light, so keep your ISO low like at 100.  You’ll have plenty of light to be able to choose your desired depth of field with your Aperture setting.  Your Shutter Speed will be very fast, so no worries about camera shake.  However, when the light fades and you need to hand hold your camera, you’ll have to bump up the ISO so that you don’t have to slow down your Shutter Speed and/or open up your Aperture all the way to let in extra light and lose your depth of field if you don’t want to.  By the way, don’t make the mistake of leaving a high ISO setting from the night before and go out in the sun the next day taking pictures.  You’ll have a mess, and some shutter speeds may not even go that high to compensate for all the extra light.

So for homework, check and see what ISO settings come with your camera and take shots of an image (containing some detail and some smooth continuous tone), in various ISO settings.  Determine for yourself what is the acceptable noise level for you.

One fun tool I didn’t have last week but was brought to my attention thanks to a comment by a reader, is this really fun virtual online camera that lets you practice your exposure skills by changing Shutter Speeds and Aperture settings, then taking virtual pictures to see how you do.  So for those without a camera or if you just want to practice while at your computer, this is just the neatest little thing!  Make sure to read the explanation to see how to get the most out of the tool.  Click HERE to go to that site.  Happy snapping!

F a c e b o o k